Alternative Dispute Resolution

Mediation is a process in which disputants, guided by a mediator, attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their differences pending at the EUIPO and, as the case may be, elsewhere (either within the EU or internationally).

Neutrality and impartiality of the mediator are the cornerstones of this interest-based, not rights-based process, together with the voluntary participation of the parties, the flexibility and confidentiality of the proceedings and the autonomy and attendance of all parties.

Mediation in the EUIPO Boards of Appeal is not limited to the Intellectual Property rights that the Office manages (trade marks and designs) but can include other IP rights (such as copyright, domain names and patents) or any other dispute pending between the parties, if they so wish.

The mediator’s role is to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary and mutually satisfactory settlement. It is not the role of the mediator to give legal advice, to propose his/her own solutions or to represent any party or adjudicate on the merits of the case. Settlement is consensual and has to be agreed to by the parties.

One of the main benefits of a settlement agreement achieved through mediation is that it is more likely to preserve an amicable and sustainable relationship between the parties. These benefits are even more pronounced in cross-border contexts, where global packages can be negotiated and multiple litigation avoided. Mediation may even give rise to new business opportunities.

Mediation may be held entirely online or in person at the EUIPO in Alicante; in both cases the service does not require the payment of an additional fee by the parties. However, where mediation takes place in the EUIPO premises in Brussels, a one-off fee of EUR 750 is charged to cover the travel and accommodation expenses of the EUIPO mediator.

Detailed documentation on all aspects of the mediation process can be accessed from this page by clicking on the links below:

Conciliation is a voluntary process in which a conciliator proactively suggests possible solutions to the dispute. These proposals will be discussed, negotiated and fine-tuned with the parties, who remain at all times free to accept or decline the proposed solution.

The conciliator will be in charge of guiding the conciliation process and will submit a proposal for the settlement of the dispute, if he or she considers there is a reasonable prospect that it could be accepted by the parties and an end put to the dispute. It must be stressed that the decision to conciliate is purely voluntary and requires the consent of all parties to the dispute.

The procedure differs from mediation in that the conciliator makes proposals as to how the dispute could be swiftly settled whereas in mediation the mediator usually does not make proposals but works with the parties to assist them in formulating their own proposals. 

When suitable, conciliation may be suggested by the Rapporteur of a case pending at the Boards of Appeal. However, it can also be requested by one or both parties, using a unilateral or joint request form. In all cases, the consent of all parties to the dispute will be needed.

Detailed documentation on all aspects of the conciliation process can be accessed by clicking on the links below.

Expert determination is a process in which an expert appointed by the parties to a dispute gives a binding or non-binding opinion on the matters that have been submitted for determination. It is mainly designed to be offered to disputants that are unable to agree on specific legal, commercial and/or technical issue(s) in the context of some other ongoing ADR process, most typically mediation.

Normally, the matters brought for expert determination are technical or legal issues that form part of the overall dispute, but on which the parties are unable to agree.

The determination will be made in writing and the decision to appoint an expert is purely voluntary and requires the consent of both parties to the dispute. 

Expert determination may be requested by the parties at any stage of a mediation or any other ADR process related to proceedings before the Office. It may also be suggested upon the initiative of the mediator or other ADR facilitator. However, in order to request Expert Determination, the parties must submit a joint request and it is thus a purely consensual process. The list of experts is available here

Detailed documentation on all aspects of the expert determination process can be accessed by clicking on the links below.

The SAB network draws together public institutional and private business representatives to work on holistic and coordinated lines of action in furthering dispute prevention, de-escalation and resolution with the aim of ensuring that the services offered are first-rate and meet real commercial needs and interests, in particular those of SMEs.

Stakeholders include representatives from IP user and EU business associations, Member State IP offices offering or intending to offer ADR, the EU Commission, international ADR centres, EU bar associations and other entities with relevant expertise.

The ADR-SAB holds meetings twice a year, organises working groups and  follows up through regular reports and feedback on the effectiveness of initiatives taken.

The ADRS established a cooperation with courts in the European Union that have jurisdiction in intellectual and industrial property cases, aiming to create a network of courts which promote mediation in IP disputes.

This cooperation programme is highly advantageous for strengthening the use of mediation in IP proceedings pending before national Courts and EU/national IP Offices and for generating close cooperation with the various national and European mediation and other ADR providers.

Some of the goals of the cooperation programme are: to increase the impact of mediation in IP, to raise awareness among IP right owners involved in multiple disputes in order to arrive at sustainable global settlements, to foster mediation by establishing a road map by which judges will refer IP cases to ADR, to achieve better and more durable agreements than those reached just through negotiation and to allow the creation of close links with mediation-friendly judges and draw in new members of the judiciary.