Go to home page
EUIPO
Protect your trade marks and designs in the European Union

Protect your intellectual property in the European Union

Menu

News

March 19, 2020 About the EUIPO

Extension of time limits COVID 19: time limits affected, nature of extension and communications to users


 

In order to provide users with further guidance on Decision No EX-20-3 extending time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 in the context of the coronavirus outbreak, the following clarification has been issued about the time limits affected by the extension, the nature of the extension and the measures to adapt communications sent to users.

Ι. TIME LIMITS AFFECTED BY THE EXTENSION

Article 1 of Decision No EX-20-3 of the Executive Director of the Office of 16 March 2020 extends until 1 May (in practice 4 May, since 1 May is a public holiday, followed by a weekend) ‘all time limits expiring between 9 March and 30 April 2020 inclusive that affect all parties in proceedings before the Office’.

Article 101 (4) EUTMR, which empowers the Executive Director to extend time limits in the case of exceptional occurrences uses a similar language, by also referring to ‘all time limits’ and ‘all parties to the proceedings’.

The reference to ‘all time limits’ is to be read literally and encompasses all procedural deadlines, irrespective of whether they have been set by the Office or are statutory in nature (i.e. are stipulated directly in the Regulations).

For the sake of clarity, this expression covers:

  • Time limits set by any instance of the Office, in any proceeding before the EUIPO, including its Boards of Appeal
  • Time limits imposed directly by the EUTMR, the EUTMIR or the EUTMDR as well as CDR and CDIR
     
    • including those originating from the Paris Convention or other International Treaties, and
    • regardless of whether they are excluded from restitutio in integrum within the meaning of Article 104 (5) EUTMR and Article 67(5) CDR
       
  • In particular, the following statutory time limits are covered by the extension:
     
    • Payment of the Application Fee (Article 32 EUTMR)
    • Right of Priority (Article 34(1) EUTMR and Article 41 CDR)
    • Exhibition Priority (Article 38(1) EUTMR and Article 44 CDR)
    • Opposition Period (Article 46(1) EUTMR)
    • Payment of the Opposition Fee (Article 46(3) EUTMR)
    • Request for Renewal (Article 53(3) EUTMR and Article 13 CDR)
    • Filing of an Appeal and of the Statement of Grounds, payment of the Appeal Fee (Article 68 (1) EUTMR and Article 57 CDR),
    • Conversion (Article 139 EUTMR)
    • Deferment of publication of design (Article 50 CDR).

However, the reference in the Decision to ‘proceedings before the Office’ means that time limits that relate to proceedings before other authorities are not covered by the extension, even if mentioned in the Regulations. This is in particular the case with regard to the time limit for:

  • Bringing an action before the General Court against decisions of the Boards of Appeal (Article 72(5) EUTMR and Article 61 CDR).

Finally, it should be pointed out that the expression ‘proceedings before the Office’ only relates to trade mark and design matters, which means that time limits related to subjects not dealt with by the EUTMR or the CDR (such as employment or procurement) or which relate to other matters (e.g. the governance of the Office) are also not covered by the Decision of the Executive Director.

II.  NATURE OF THE EXTENSION

The extension of time limits granted by the Executive Director has the immediate effect of preventing the deadlines concerned from lapsing when they were originally due, and of setting a new expiry date applicable to all, namely the 1 May 2020 (in practice, 4 May).

This effect is automatic and derives directly from the Decision of the Executive Director. Accordingly, affected parties are not required to file a request to the Office for the extension of the time limit to take effect.

Parties to ongoing proceedings are therefore advised not to lodge unnecessary requests for extension.

It should be noted, however, that in case the parties are in a position to meet either the original or the extended deadline, and choose to discharge their procedural obligations during that period, the procedure will take its usual course and any documents filed will be examined in the regular manner.

III. COMMUNICATIONS SENT TO USERS

The immediate effect of the extension also implies that users whose time limits are concerned will not be informed about the grant of the extension by means of individual communications.

The Office has done its utmost to adapt its IT systems in such a way as to guarantee a seamless treatment of the time limits that were due to expire before the extension date. However, in the unlikely event that a communication from the Office does not adhere to the given extension, the Office will address the case immediately by issuing a rectification either of its own motion or following a written request from the user indicating the file number concerned.

 


 
We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience. We also use analytics. Click for more information